这是个标题党味很重的说法。你是想：

Considering user options

I can ask for clarification regarding the user's post, asking if they want a summary, verification, source, or context analysis. Since they posted a headline, I think it's best to present quick options in concise Chinese without heavy formatting—maybe even bullet points. If they share a link, I could also fact-check. As of my last knowledge update, Salah had a contract with Liverpool until June 2025, after signing a three-year extension in 2022.Clarifying contract context

I need to be careful not to assert unknown details for December 2025. I can present known historical context up to 2024, like stating, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;In the past two years, Saudi clubs made multiple offers for Salah, which Liverpool rejected, and his contract was until 2025.[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; It's essential to add a caveat that circumstances may have changed. I should also parse the headline that mentions Salah criticizing Liverpool and discuss the implications of choosing between Saudi and European clubs, labeling it as analysis, not fact.Crafting a concise response

I want to clarify what the user needs: do they want to confirm authenticity, get a summary, a translation, analysis, a timeline, or see sources? For an immediate take, I can't verify real-time without a link. The headline uses [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;炮轰,[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; which sounds sensational; if they share the article, I can check the quotes.

I'll mention that there have been Saudi bids since 2023 that Liverpool refused, highlighting the wage gap. Here's what I can do: 1) Quick verification (needs link) 2) Provide context and potential impact 3) Write a social media post/title 4) Translate to English 5) Summarize if they paste the original text.

\n